Why Outcome Clarity Matters: When ~75-85% of ONSBT outcomes are indeterminate from public data, people with disabilities can't:
This is a disability justice issue: Outcome obscurity disproportionately harms people with disabilities navigating complex administrative systems while experiencing barriers to information access.
| Year | Total Decisions | Clear Outcome | Unclear Outcome | % Unclear |
|---|
What ONSBT Does: Independent administrative tribunal hearing appeals from:
Who Uses ONSBT: People with disabilities (physical, mental, developmental) denied ODSP; people experiencing poverty denied OW; family members/advocates supporting appellants.
Common Appeal Reasons:
Data Source: 13,798 ONSBT decisions from CanLII (2020-2026), analyzed May 2026
Year-by-Year Breakdown:
Outcome Classification Method: Keyword-based inference from decision text. "Clear outcome" = decision contains outcome indicators ("allowed," "dismissed," "granted," "denied," "withdrawn"). "Unclear outcome" = no standard outcome language found.
Limitation: CanLII API responses do not include standardized structured outcome labels. Keyword-based classification is approximate. ~75-85% of ONSBT decisions have unclear outcomes. To get 100% accurate outcomes, would require manual reading of each decision.
Why This Matters for Disability Justice:
Cross-Tribunal Analysis: Outcome obscurity affects ONSBT (disability benefits) AND WSIAT (workplace injury) AND HRTO (discrimination) — proving this is system-wide issue affecting entire disability community.
Created by: 3mpwrApp — grassroots disability justice project by and for injured workers, people with disabilities, and vulnerable communities
Purpose: Provide transparency into ONSBT patterns to help people with disabilities navigate ODSP/OW appeals and understand systemic barriers
License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike)
Report Date: May 14, 2026